Humber

Course Outline

Course Name: WTF: Profanity, Language, and Power (CULT 2300)

Academic Period: 2024 - 2025

Faculty:


Faculty Availability:

Associate Dean:
Michelle Jordan
michelle.jordan@humber.ca

Schedule Type Code:

Land Acknowledgement

Humber College is located within the traditional and treaty lands of the Mississaugas of the Credit. Known as Adoobiigok [A-doe-bee-goke], the “Place of the Alders” in Michi Saagiig [Mi-Chee Saw-Geeg] language, the region is uniquely situated along Humber River Watershed, which historically provided an integral connection for Anishinaabe [Ah-nish-nah-bay], Haudenosaunee [Hoeden-no-shownee], and Wendat [Wine-Dot] peoples between the Ontario Lakeshore and the Lake Simcoe/Georgian Bay regions. Now home to people of numerous nations, Adoobiigok continues to provide a vital source of interconnection for all.

Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Statement

Humber College and the University of Guelph-Humber (Humber) are leaders in providing a learning, working and living environment that recognizes and values equity, diversity and inclusion in all its programs and services. Humber commits to reflect the diversity of the communities the College serves. Students, faculty, support and administrative staff feel a sense of belonging and have opportunities to be their authentic selves.

Faculty or Department Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences
Course Name: WTF: Profanity, Language, and Power (CULT 2300)
Pre-Requisites none
Co-Requisites none
Pre-Requisites for none
Equates none
Restrictions none
Credit Value
Total Course Hours
Developed By: Prepared By: Approved by:
Michelle Jordan

Humber Learning Outcomes (HLOs) in this course.

The HLOs are a cross-institutional learning outcomes strategy aimed at equipping Humber graduates with the employability skills, mindsets, and values they need to succeed in the future of work. To explore all the HLOs, please consult the Humber Learning Outcomes framework.

  • A white tree with roots, branches, and leaves appearing in an orange and green circleEquity, Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging
  • A white turtle appearing in an orange circleIndigenous Ways of Being Knowing and Doing (IWBKD)
  • A white canoe rowing into a red circleCritical Thinking
  • A white howling coyote in a green circleCommunication

Course Description

In a world where words hold increasing influence, this course explores the complex connection between language, power, and profanity. Through the lens of profanity and other taboo communication, students will investigate what gives words their power and how words - including the naughty ones - can empower or disempower individuals and communities. From forbidden language to the amplified rhetoric of world and cultural leaders, students will discover how language shapes their world and is a tool used to marginalize or liberate and control or resist. Using local and global examples both past and present, students will connect concepts of language and power to examine how language has influenced their own lives and communities. Content Warning: This course explores the use of profanity and taboo language in various social, cultural, and historical contexts. Discussions and materials will contain explicit language, sensitive topics, and depictions of power dynamics, oppression, and discrimination. Though every effort will be made to explore these topics with sensitivity, respect, and intellectual honesty, some individuals may find the content uncomfortable or triggering. Students who may be offended or disturbed by such material should take this into consideration before enrolling in this class.

Course Rationale

Cultural Studies courses provide a toolbox with which to critically interrogate major social and economic forces and conditions, including technology, culture, identity and power. The interdisciplinary approach of Cultural Studies encourages student reflection and engagement in the social world, thereby promoting active participation in both the production and consumption of culture

Course Learning Method(s)

  • Collaborative Learning
  • Lecture
  • Student-led Learning
  • Inquiry Based Learning

Course Learning Outcomes (CLO)

Learning Outcome Learning Objectives Summative Assessments Formative Assessments
Apply social, political, cultural, and linguistic concepts to explain the role of profanity in society.
  • Negotiated per Section: Quizzes, Online Discussions, Short Projects, Reflections and/or Presentations
  • Written Assignment #1
  • Tests
    Analyze the use of profanity across a variety of sources to demonstrate how language is used to empower or disempower people and communities.
    • Negotiated per Section: Quizzes, Online Discussions, Short Projects, Reflections and/or Presentations
    • Tests
    • Written Assignment #1
      Scrutinize personal attitudes about profanity and how they may be influenced by societal norms to promote self-awareness and empathy.
      • Negotiated per Section: Quizzes, Online Discussions, Short Projects, Reflections and/or Presentations
        Identify linguistic features and rhetorical strategies of profane language to analyze power dynamics and social meaning.
        • Written Assignment #2
        • Negotiated per Section: Quizzes, Online Discussions, Short Projects, Reflections and/or Presentations
        • Tests
          Assess profanity to explain how language is used to form identity.
          • Negotiated per Section: Quizzes, Online Discussions, Short Projects, Reflections and/or Presentations
          • Tests
          • Written Assignment #2
            Compare cultural perceptions of profanity to understand similarities and differences in how cultures and societies respond to profanity.
            • Negotiated per Section: Quizzes, Online Discussions, Short Projects, Reflections and/or Presentations
            • Tests
            • Written Assignment #2
              Use profanity responsibly and ethically to promote inclusivity and social justice.
              • Negotiated per Section: Quizzes, Online Discussions, Short Projects, Reflections and/or Presentations
              • Tests
              • Written Assignment #1
              • Written Assignment #2

                Assessment Weighting

                Assessment Weight
                Test
                    Tests 20%
                Writing Assignment
                    Written Assignment #1 20%
                    Written Assignment #2 20%
                Instructor-Created Assessments
                    Negotiated per Section: Quizzes, Online Discussions, Short Projects, Reflections and/or Presentations 40%
                Total 100%

                Modules of Study

                Module Course Learning Outcomes Resources Assessments
                The Origins of Profanity: What's profanity? Where does it come from? Who and what makes some words profane and not others?
                • Apply social, political, cultural, and linguistic concepts to explain the role of profanity in society.
                • Compare cultural perceptions of profanity to understand similarities and differences in how cultures and societies respond to profanity.
                • Negotiated per Section: Quizzes, Online Discussions, Short Projects, Reflections and/or Presentations
                • Written Assignment #1
                • Tests
                The Purpose of Profanity: Why do people swear? What are the linguistic and social functions of profanity?
                • Apply social, political, cultural, and linguistic concepts to explain the role of profanity in society.
                • Scrutinize personal attitudes about profanity and how they may be influenced by societal norms to promote self-awareness and empathy.
                • Identify linguistic features and rhetorical strategies of profane language to analyze power dynamics and social meaning.
                • Negotiated per Section: Quizzes, Online Discussions, Short Projects, Reflections and/or Presentations
                • Written Assignment #1
                • Tests
                Profanity and Identity: How does language and profanity shape identity and world view?
                • Scrutinize personal attitudes about profanity and how they may be influenced by societal norms to promote self-awareness and empathy.
                • Identify linguistic features and rhetorical strategies of profane language to analyze power dynamics and social meaning.
                • Assess profanity to explain how language is used to form identity.
                • Negotiated per Section: Quizzes, Online Discussions, Short Projects, Reflections and/or Presentations
                • Tests
                • Written Assignment #2
                Profanity, Power, and Control: How is language controlled? How has language been used to control people? How has profanity been used to disempower people?
                • Analyze the use of profanity across a variety of sources to demonstrate how language is used to empower or disempower people and communities.
                • Identify linguistic features and rhetorical strategies of profane language to analyze power dynamics and social meaning.
                • Use profanity responsibly and ethically to promote inclusivity and social justice.
                • Negotiated per Section: Quizzes, Online Discussions, Short Projects, Reflections and/or Presentations
                • Tests
                • Written Assignment #2
                Profanity, Power, and Liberation: How have communities and people reclaimed profanity and taboo language? How have people use profanity to empower themselves and their communities?
                • Analyze the use of profanity across a variety of sources to demonstrate how language is used to empower or disempower people and communities.
                • Identify linguistic features and rhetorical strategies of profane language to analyze power dynamics and social meaning.
                • Use profanity responsibly and ethically to promote inclusivity and social justice.
                • Negotiated per Section: Quizzes, Online Discussions, Short Projects, Reflections and/or Presentations
                • Written Assignment #1
                • Tests
                • Written Assignment #2

                Required Resources

                Title ISBN

                Anderson, Catherine. (2022). 2.2 Language and offence. In Catherine Anderson, Essentials of Linguistics, 2nd edition (2nd ed.). eCampusOntario. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/essentialsoflinguistics2/chapter/2-2-language-and-offense/

                2.1 Language and identity. (n.d.). In Catherine Anderson, Bronwyn Bjorkman, Derek Denis, Julianne Doner, Margaret Grant, Nathan Sanders, & and Ai Taniguchi, Essentials of Linguistics (2nd ed.). https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/essentialsoflinguistics2/chapter/2-1-language-and-identity/. McMaster University.

                2.3 Derogation, toxicity, and power imbalances. (2022). In Catherine Anderson, Essentials of Linguisitics. eCampusOntario. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/essentialsoflinguistics2/chapter/2-3-derogation-toxicity-and-power-imbalances/

                2.8 Legally enshrined harms. (2022). In Catherine Anderson, Essentials of Linguisitics. eCampusOntario. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/essentialsoflinguistics2/chapter/2-8-language-policy/

                Boroditsky, Lera.(n.d.). How language shapes the way we think - TED [Video]. TED. https://www.ted.com/talks/lera_boroditsky_how_language_shapes_the_way_we_think?language=en

                Coles, G., &  Stepinski, Tomasz. (2016). Emerging Voices: The Exorcism of Language: Reclaimed Derogatory Terms and Their Limits. College English, 78(5), 424–446. https://ezproxy.humber.ca/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/emerging-voices-exorcism-language-reclaimed/docview/1787109531/se-2?accountid=11530

                Jay, T. (2009). The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01115.x

                Lane, Nikki. (n.d.). Black women queering the mic: Missy Elliott disturbing the boundaries of racialized sexuality and gender . https://ezproxy.humber.ca/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,url&db=sih&AN=62597712&site=ehost-live&scope=site

                Mantell, A. (n.d.). Meet Sociolinguistics: What all the cool feminists are talking about. In A. Mantell, Wordslut (pp. 1–20).

                Mohr, Melissa. (2013). Introduction. In Melissa. Mohr, Holy shit: a brief history of swearing (p. 1 online resource (x, 316 p. )). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/humber/reader.action?docID=1141968&ppg=14Melissa Mohr. (2013). Introduction Chapter in Holy Sh*t: A Brief History of Swearing. Oxford University Press.

                O’Connor, E. M. (2020, December 7). Why they tried to censor the blues. Classic Rock. www.loudersound.com

                Pinker, S. (n.d.). Seven words you can’t say on television. In S. Pinker, The stuff of thought:  Language as a window into human nature. (pp. 323–372).

                Stapleton, K., Beers Fägersten, K., Stephens, R., & Loveday, C. (2022). The power of swearing: What we know and what we don’t. Lingua, 277, 103406-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103406

                St Clare, K. J. (2018). Linguistic disarmament: on how hate speech functions, the way hate words can be reclaimed, and why we must pursue their reclamation. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, 17, 79–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22381/LPI1720185

                Vsauce. (2013, November). Why Are Bad Words Bad? [Video]. YouTube.

                Supplemental Resources

                Title ISBN

                Abad-Santos, Alex. (2023). The Taunt That Eclipsed the NCAA Women's Basketball Championship: Angel Reese, Caitlin Clarke, and the Respectability Politics of Women's Basketball. Vox. 

                Beers Fägersten, K. (2012). Chapter 1 in Who’s swearing now? the social aspects of conversational swearing . Cambridge Scholars Publishing. https://ezproxy.humber.ca/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,url&db=e000xna&AN=532347&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_3

                Bonette-Bailey, Lakeyta. (2018). Rap music's path from pariah to Pulitzer. Bizarre Culture.

                Davis, W. (2019). Why Indigenous languages matter. Canadian Geographic. https://canadiangeographic.ca/articles/why-indigenous-languages-matter/

                Eldridge, Stephen. (2023). Profanity | Definition, Examples, Words, & Facts. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/profanity

                Green, Annalise. (2018). The rhetoric of N.W.A.’s Fuck the Police. Pepperdine Journal of Communication. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1098&context=pjcr

                 
                 

                Hostetter, A. B., & Rascon-Powell, D. K. (2024). F@#k Pain! The Effect of Taboo Language and Gesture on the Experience of Pain. Psychological Reports, 127(2), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941221125776

                Lopez, G.(2017). Ta-Nehisi Coates has an incredibly clear explanation for why white people shouldn’t use the n-word. Vox; Vox. https://www.vox.com/identities/2017/11/9/16627900/ta-nehisi-coates-n-word

                Pierre-Louis, Kendra. (2017). The language you speak changes your perception of time. Popular Science. https://www.popsci.com/language-time-perception/

                Williams, Stereo. (2018). Kendrick Lamar, Black Language and What White Fans Don’t Get About the ‘N-Word’. Billboard; Billboard. https://www.billboard.com/music/rb-hip-hop/kendrick-lamar-n-word-white-fans-8457834/

                Mack, David. (2023). The c-word Is everywhere right now. Rolling Stone. https://ezproxy.humber.ca/login?url=https://advance.lexis.com/api/document?collection=news&id=urn:contentItem:687M-THK1-JB0P-B140-00000-00&context=1516831

                The Royal Institution. (2018). Why the #$@&% Does Swearing Reduce Pain? - YouTube [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MDW1zgwOhw

                Stordeur Pryor, Elizabeth. (2019). Why it’s so hard to talk about the N-word - TED [Video]. TED. https://www.ted.com/talks/elizabeth_stordeur_pryor_why_it_s_so_hard_to_talk_about_the_n_word

                Tait, Amelia. (2022). Are TikTok Algorithms Changing How People Talk About Suicide? WIRED.

                Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Chapter 26: Suppressing Aboriginal languages: 1867 - 1939. In Canada’s Residential Schools: The History, Part 1, Origins to 1939. https://ezproxy.humber.ca/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,url&db=e000xna&AN=1171717&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_615

                Why cartoon characters curse like this. (2019). Vox. [Video] YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9ottUEiIm8

                Resource(s):

                Course material costs can be found through the Humber Bookstore.

                Prior Learning Assessment & Recognition (PLAR)

                Prior Learning Assessment and Recognition (PLAR) is the formal evaluation and credit-granting process whereby candidates may obtain credits for prior learning. Prior learning includes the knowledge competencies and skills acquired, in both formal and informal ways, outside of post-secondary education. Candidates may have their knowledge, skills and competencies evaluated against the learning outcomes as defined in the course outline. Please review the Assessment Methods Glossary for more information on the Learning Portfolio assessment methods identified below.

                The method(s) that are used to assess prior learning for this course may include:

                • Challenge Exam (results recorded as a % grade and added to student’s CGPA)

                Please contact the Program Coordinator for more details.

                Academic Regulations

                It is the student's responsibility to be aware of the College Academic Regulations. The Academic Regulations apply to all applicants to Humber and all current students enrolled in any program or course offered by Humber, in any location. Information about academic appeals is found in the Academic Regulations.  

                Anti-Discrimination Statement

                At Humber College, all forms of discrimination and harassment are prohibited. Students and employees have the right to study, live and work in an environment that is free from discrimination and harassment. If you need assistance on concerns related to discrimination and harassment, please contact the Centre for Human Rights, Equity and Inclusion or the Office of Student Conduct.

                Accessible Learning Services

                Humber strives to create a welcoming environment for all students where equity, diversity and inclusion are paramount. Accessible Learning Services facilitates equal access for students with disabilities by coordinating academic accommodations and services.  Staff in Accessible Learning Services are available by appointment to assess specific needs, provide referrals and arrange appropriate accommodations. If you require academic accommodations, contact:

                Accessible Learning Services

                North Campus: (416) 675-6622 X5090

                Lakeshore Campus: (416) 675-6622 X3331 

                Academic Integrity

                Academic integrity is essentially honesty in all academic endeavors. Academic integrity requires that students avoid all forms of academic misconduct or dishonesty, including plagiarism, cheating on tests or exams or any misrepresentation of academic accomplishment.

                Disclaimer

                While every effort is made by the professor/faculty to cover all material listed in the outline, the order, content, and/or evaluation may change in the event of special circumstances (e.g. time constraints due to inclement weather, sickness, college closure, technology/equipment problems or changes, etc.). In any such case, students will be given appropriate notification in writing, with approval from the Senior Dean (or designate) of the Faculty.

                Copyright

                Copyright is the exclusive legal right given to a creator to reproduce, publish, sell or distribute his/her work. All members of the Humber community are required to comply with Canadian copyright law which governs the reproduction, use and distribution of copyrighted materials. This means that the copying, use and distribution of copyright- protected materials, regardless of format, is subject to certain limits and restrictions. For example, photocopying or scanning an entire textbook is not allowed, nor is distributing a scanned book.

                See the Humber Libraries website for additional information regarding copyright and for details on allowable limits.


                Humber College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning • 2024/2025.